Systematic review with meta-analysis: impact of one-handed vs. two-handed technique on quality outcomes of colonoscopy

N. Imperatore, G.D. De Palma, P. Dolce, A. Grassano, N. Caporaso, A. Rispo

Gastroenterology, Surgical Endoscopy, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine “Federico II” of Naples, Naples, Italy. nicola.imperatore@alice.it

---

• Gastroenterology

OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy is usually performed with the one-handed technique (1HT), although several countries and operators still adopt the two-handed technique (2HT). It is still uncertain whether the 1HT can improve the quality outcomes of colonoscopy. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to explore the quality outcomes in patients undergoing 1HT or 2HT colonoscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare the pooled rates of adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), cecal intubation time (CIT), and withdrawal time (WT), in patients undergoing 1HT or 2HT colonoscopy via PubMed/EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcome was the pooled rate of ADR and CIR. CIT and WT were also assessed. Pooled odds ratio (OR), standard mean differences (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed or random-effect models.

RESULTS: Five studies (15,763 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled ADR was not significantly different between the two techniques (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.88-1.39; p=0.16), and CIR was not significantly different in 1HT from 2HT (OR 0.757; 95% CI 0.55-1.02; p=0.07), with no significant heterogeneity. Furthermore, no significant differences were seen for CIT (SMD 0.95; p=0.62) and WT (SMD 0.58; p=0.74).

CONCLUSIONS: The 1HT colonoscopy does not add relevant improvement in the quality and efficacy of colonoscopy.

Free PDF Download