AIMS baby movement scale application in high-risk infants early intervention analysis

Y. Wang, J.-P. Shi, Y.-H. Li, W.-H. Yang, Y.-J. Tian, J. Gao, S.-J. Li

Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China. yqtqdygoqrrw2@163.com

---

• Neurology

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the application of Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) in screening motor development delay in the follow-up of high-risk infants who were discharged from NICU, to explain the state of infants’ motor development and propose early individualized intervention.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study design was a randomized, single-blind trial by selecting patients between April 2015 and November 2015 in our hospital, children nerve recovery branch clinics and 77 cases of high-risk infants. We randomly divided the patients into observation group (39 cases) and control group (38 cases). To evaluate the application with AIMS, observation group was based on evaluation results for the first time to give rehabilitation training plan making, early intervention, control group according to the growth and development milestone in order to guide parents to take family training interval of 3 months.

RESULTS: While comparing the two groups of high-risk infants before the intervention, the months of age, gender, risk factors, it was found that the AIMS scores, each position AIMS scores did not show a significant difference in percentile (p>0.05). There was also no significant difference between two groups in the seat and stand AIMS scores before and after intervention (p>0.05). However, the comparison of two groups of high-risk infants after intervention in comparison showed that the observation group supine AIMS scores and AIMS scores were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.05). Prone position AIMS scores observation group was also significantly higher than that of the control group (p<0.01). The corresponding percentile for two groups after the intervention of AIMS scores was less than 10% of cases, which was significantly lower in the observation group (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: AIMS can predict the development delay in high-risk infants, for improving the early hypernymic diagnosis and intervention.

Free PDF Download