Cost-effectiveness analysis of adding omega-3 or vitamin D supplementation to standard therapy in treating painful crises of pediatric sickle cell disease patients

S.M. Abdelhalima, J.E. Murphy, M.H. Meabed, A.A. Elberry, M.M. Gamaleldin, H.K. Alshaeri, B.A. Mohammad, R.R.S. Hussein

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt, a joint Supervision Committee for the Ph.D. with the Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, R. K. Coit College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. drshimaa.nashat@gmail.com

---

• Pediatrics

OBJECTIVE: Painful crises represents a predominant complication of sickle cell disease (SCD). The only approved treatments for painful crises in many countries are hydroxyurea plus potent analgesics. Our earlier clinical trial concluded that omega-3 and vitamin D had a potential therapeutic impact on painful crises. However, there is limited research evaluating their therapeutic applications and cost-effectiveness. This paper aims at comparing the cost-effectiveness of omega-3 and vitamin D supplementation to the standard therapy in treating painful crises among children with SCD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analyses of daily supplementation of omega-3 and vitamin D were performed. The economic evaluation was based on data derived from a prospective 10-month randomized clinical trial (n = 165 patients; 15 patients dropped). 50 patients were recruited into the omega-3 + standard therapy group (hydroxyurea and folic acid daily with ibuprofen as needed), 50 patients into the vitamin D + standard therapy group, and 50 patients receiving standard therapy alone served as a control group. Outcome measures from the randomized clinical trial were used to determine incremental effectiveness. Cost estimates were calculated from the healthcare payer’s perspective. The analysis considered the improvement in various outcome measures and are presented here as percent change from baseline to determine the incremental effectiveness and the incremental cost for the treatment of both interventions.

RESULTS: Adding omega-3 or vitamin D to the standard therapy was more cost-effective than standard treatment alone. Vitamin D was a cheaper but less cost-effective alternative for most outcomes between the two treatments, including LDL-C and HDL-C. It was also more cost-effective but less clinically effective in reducing vaso-occlusive crisis episodes and pain severity. Omega-3 supplementation was significantly more cost-effective than vitamin D supplementation and the standard treatment for those measures.

CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that using vitamin D and omega-3 as add-on treatments for a painful crisis in pediatric sickle cell disease could have overall cost-saving and clinical benefits. However, further studies with a longer treatment duration are needed to establish more significant effects of the interventions for better policy and clinical decision-making.

Free PDF Download